Electrosphere.info: The "Invincible" Aegir Fleet - Electrosphere.info

Jump to content

Hide message Show message
Welcome to Electrosphere.info!

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more.

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The "Invincible" Aegir Fleet The pride of the Erusian Navy

#1 User is offline   Ribbon-Azure 

  • Boundless
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,745
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boulder, CO
  • Aircraft:ASF-28 Tomcat II
  • Squadron:VF-23/EASA

Posted 18 May 2008 - 03:05 PM

THE "INVINCIBLE" AEGIR FLEET
- Pride of the Erusean Navy


- an image taken from the Cruiser Beluga of the Battleship Tanager, heavily damaged. Taken on November 23rd, 2004. -


Background:
The Aegir Fleet is primarily made up of twelve notable ships within it's main battle group. During the preparation for the amphibious assault, the Aegir Fleet was supported by multiple Destroyers, Submarines, Crusiers, and various cargo, troop and fuel transports. The Battleship Tanager had taken the place as the Flag Ship of the Aegir Fleet; this was odd since the Flagship of Modern Naval Fleets is usually the Aircraft Carrier.

History:
The Aegir Fleet had become one of the most threatening Erusean controlled 'units', during the Usean Continental War of 2004 and 2005. With their fleet's title being "Invincible", the pride in which Erusea had in them and the fear they instilled in the ISAF, it is assumed the Aegir Fleet had never lost a battle in the early stages of the Continental War, if not before that. When the war had settled across the Usean Continent with the ISAF operating from North Point on the Eastern-Coast, the Aegir Fleet saw little action.

This was until they were suddenly given orders to move out to Comberth Harbor, in the midst of a large campaign to send reinforcements to the frontlines and prepare an invasion of North Point. The Aegir Fleet was to be the centerpiece of the Amphibious Assault Force which had that very goal. However, on the way there, problems had arisen. Many large aerial transports were shot down by ISAF Aircraft on their way to Comberth Harbor.

The Aegir Fleet made its way to the Harbor, without any damage, and linked up with the amphibious assault group. As they waited in harbor, an unexpected ISAF Air Raid attacked the petrol chemical facility, which was to supply the enormous fleet . This effectively delayed Erusea's plans to invade North Point and also immobilized the Aegir Fleet.

Striking while the iron was hot, the Independent States Allied Forces launched an attack on the "Invincible" Aegir Fleet, on November 23rd, 2004. The ISAF codenamed this attack "Operation: Rough Seas". The attack began at around 1200hrs. and lasted for fifteen minutes. During the attack the Erusean Naval and Ground Forces were caught completely off guard. Initially, some thought it was a training exercise. The Aegir Fleet was spread out through out Comberth Harbor. The Geofon, Raven, Beluga and Tanager were caught at anchor, outside of the Harbor. The ships were decimated. The Battleship Tanager was split in half by a well placed enemy attack, during the battle.


-overhead view of New Comberth Harbor-

Lazuli, Koga, Fernis, Taisch, Herne and Thiassi were destroyed within their maintenance areas near the ammo and fuel dump, and also near the submarine pens before they could make open water. The Submarine Beowulf Nu was destroyed leaving the sub pens, while the Beowulf Pi was destroyed in the pens.

The battle resulted in the Aegir Fleet being destroyed, the amphibious assault fleet being destroyed and any plans for an Erusean invasion of North Point have been called off. Erusea's morale takes damage during this attack, while the ISAF utilized this amazing victory to fuel their counterattack.


Vessels of the Aegir Fleet:
* Aegis-Class 'Raven' - Ticonderoga-class Cruiser
* Battleship 'Tanager' - Iowa Class Battleship
* Carrier 'Geofon' - Kitty Hawk-Class Aircraft Carrier
* Cruiser 'Beluga' - Hatakaze-class Destroyer
* Cruiser 'Lazuli' - Hatakaze-class Destroyer
* Cruiser 'Kolga' - Hatakaze-class Destroyer
* Cruiser 'Fenris' - Hatakaze-class Destroyer
* Destroyer 'Herne' - Cassard-class Destroyer
* Destroyer 'Thiassi' - Cassard-class Destroyer
* Destroyer 'Taisch' - Cassard-class Destroyer
* Submarine 'Beowulf Pi' - Los Angeles-class Submarine
* Submarine 'Beowulf Nu' - Los Angeles-class Submarine




SOURCES:
Ace Combat 04: Shattered Skies
Official Ace Combat 04 Website


ACCREDITATION:
elude for the resizing image of New Comberth Harbor


*Originally posted by Ribbon Blue*
Posted Image
0

#2 User is offline   Green Giant 

  • Yellow Squadron Commander
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,910
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere between here and there....
  • Aircraft:What ever is best for the mission
  • Squadron:The Yellow Squadron

Posted 27 May 2008 - 05:35 PM

Edited for Grammar and spelling.
*Former Director of the ES 2.0 Media Team*
*Commander of the Yellow Squadron*

Posted Image
0

#3 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 16 July 2008 - 12:21 AM

Corrected some errors.
0

#4 User is offline   Green Giant 

  • Yellow Squadron Commander
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,910
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere between here and there....
  • Aircraft:What ever is best for the mission
  • Squadron:The Yellow Squadron

Posted 30 September 2008 - 11:08 AM

Major revision to the format and added a link to the AC4 site in the source section.

If making corrections to the article, DO NOT Change the format.
*Former Director of the ES 2.0 Media Team*
*Commander of the Yellow Squadron*

Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   Apollo 

  • Reapers! Reapers Everywhere!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 1,309
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Im in ur ES, commenting in ur threads.
  • Aircraft:F-22A
  • Squadron:SNFU

Posted 01 January 2009 - 01:43 AM

Intersesting note: even if you destroy the Tanager, there will still be a transmisson stating it escaped.
"Pooled resources for mutual survival? Pah, NEED MORE SUPERWEAPONS."-TV Tropes on Ace Combat

"I'm a leaf on the wind. . .watch how I soar." -Wash
0

#6 User is offline   Ribbon-Blue 

  • ES is Knowledge.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Ultra Director
  • Posts: 2,758
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver, Colorado
  • Aircraft:Something with SAAMs.
  • Squadron:SMS

Posted 01 January 2009 - 07:35 AM

That always boggles my mind. I mean... the thing snaps in half for crying out loud.
0

#7 User is offline   Ribbon-Rena 

  • ES Resident Lurker
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 1,273
  • Joined: 05-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Electrosphere
  • Aircraft:F-16C B50+

Posted 01 January 2009 - 08:45 AM

Escaped the port isn't it?? It escaped.. but not to the seas.. Or Am I wrong?

And for the info about the usual Flagship, US 7th Fleet doesn't use it's carrier as a flagship, it was this special Command Ship..
QUOTE (Ribbon-Blue)
But I'm afria of the backwars 'b' button! D:


The Colorless One.. Almost became -Aqua, if Mr. Blue approves it, which he didn't
NOTE: 1. Sig too huge will be reminded, and warned, and moved
NOTE: 2. Necroposting is not illegal, if not done excessively and meaninglessly..
0

#8 User is offline   AceofAces 

  • GRRR DEATH HAHA DEATH
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 579
  • Joined: 20-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England, UK
  • Aircraft:Su-Farty7 Turdinator
  • Squadron:Exturdination Squad

Posted 01 January 2009 - 11:28 AM

Well they must be talking about it getting out the bays...plus if you look, in the area it's in there's loads of water and no land in the direction it's facing so maybe it is already at sea. And I was disappointed that the Tanager and pesky missile boats were the only boats that actually SANK when destroyed...not to mention the Tanager splitting down the middle if you look closely at it from the side. biggrin.gif
Also, in Siege of Farbanti, is that a different battleship besides the Iowa class or something? It's worth more points, and takes much more beating to destroy; also, it doesn't sink like the Tanager does because it's "Run aground and won't" sink, so I'm guessing the water's too shallow.
0

#9 User is offline   Apollo 

  • Reapers! Reapers Everywhere!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 1,309
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Im in ur ES, commenting in ur threads.
  • Aircraft:F-22A
  • Squadron:SNFU

Posted 01 January 2009 - 07:14 PM

QUOTE (Ribbon-Blue @ Jan 1 2009, 07:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That always boggles my mind. I mean... the thing snaps in half for crying out loud.

They could have said that because they didn't want to lose morale. I mean, it's the FLAGSHIP of the INVINCIBLE FLEET. If they said, "OMG, the flagship of our invincible fleet just got blown in half by ISAF fighters because we were to lazy to send out some ships on a patrol!" (or something like that laugh.gif) well, the whole freakin' navy might as well surrender.
"Pooled resources for mutual survival? Pah, NEED MORE SUPERWEAPONS."-TV Tropes on Ace Combat

"I'm a leaf on the wind. . .watch how I soar." -Wash
0

#10 User is offline   Green Giant 

  • Yellow Squadron Commander
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,910
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere between here and there....
  • Aircraft:What ever is best for the mission
  • Squadron:The Yellow Squadron

Posted 29 January 2009 - 03:01 PM

QUOTE (Ribbon-Rena @ Jan 1 2009, 03:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Escaped the port isn't it?? It escaped.. but not to the seas.. Or Am I wrong?

And for the info about the usual Flagship, US 7th Fleet doesn't use it's carrier as a flagship, it was this special Command Ship..


Thsi is correct. Usually the Task Force or Battle Group Commander uses the Carrier as the Flagship.. The Fleet commander uses a special Command Ship such as the La Salle and Blue Ridge Class ships..

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/sys...ship/lcc-19.htm

*Former Director of the ES 2.0 Media Team*
*Commander of the Yellow Squadron*

Posted Image
0

#11 User is offline   Ribbon-Rena 

  • ES Resident Lurker
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 1,273
  • Joined: 05-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Electrosphere
  • Aircraft:F-16C B50+

Posted 29 January 2009 - 03:51 PM

About sinking ships, it would be realistic to not sink the ships in an instant such as in ACX, especially larger ships.
Battleships and carrier tend to sink a lot slower than usual ships. Do note that the attacks are coming from bombs and not torpedoes, and it didn't specially mention that we hit the munitions bay. Thus it might be possible to "damage the ship beyond repair" and still consider it sunk. AC3 ships will still float with flames around, that's the most realistic one so far..
QUOTE (Ribbon-Blue)
But I'm afria of the backwars 'b' button! D:


The Colorless One.. Almost became -Aqua, if Mr. Blue approves it, which he didn't
NOTE: 1. Sig too huge will be reminded, and warned, and moved
NOTE: 2. Necroposting is not illegal, if not done excessively and meaninglessly..
0

#12 User is offline   Green Giant 

  • Yellow Squadron Commander
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,910
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere between here and there....
  • Aircraft:What ever is best for the mission
  • Squadron:The Yellow Squadron

Posted 29 January 2009 - 06:01 PM

Another problem is with battleships. They are pretty much impervious to antiship missiles.

Harpoon missiles have a high explosive warhead designed to penetrate the thin skin of most modern naval ships. The Iowa Class Battleships had a 16 inch armor belt at the waterline for torpedoes. Since your Antiship missiles are designed to impact at the waterline, they are pretty much useless.

the only real way to take them out will bombs is with armor-piercing bombs.
*Former Director of the ES 2.0 Media Team*
*Commander of the Yellow Squadron*

Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   Ribbon-Rena 

  • ES Resident Lurker
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 1,273
  • Joined: 05-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Electrosphere
  • Aircraft:F-16C B50+

Posted 29 January 2009 - 08:14 PM

ASM? You guys got Penguins in the US right? If I recall correctly it can skim low-high-low and ends with vertical dive (kinda like XAGM), that would be quite useful as Battleship had lots of deck space and not-so-thick armor on it.

That said if the missile could get past the highly advanced RAMs and CIWS..
QUOTE (Ribbon-Blue)
But I'm afria of the backwars 'b' button! D:


The Colorless One.. Almost became -Aqua, if Mr. Blue approves it, which he didn't
NOTE: 1. Sig too huge will be reminded, and warned, and moved
NOTE: 2. Necroposting is not illegal, if not done excessively and meaninglessly..
0

#14 User is offline   Green Giant 

  • Yellow Squadron Commander
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,910
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere between here and there....
  • Aircraft:What ever is best for the mission
  • Squadron:The Yellow Squadron

Posted 30 January 2009 - 11:41 AM

QUOTE (Ribbon-Rena @ Jan 29 2009, 03:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ASM? You guys got Penguins in the US right? If I recall correctly it can skim low-high-low and ends with vertical dive (kinda like XAGM), that would be quite useful as Battleship had lots of deck space and not-so-thick armor on it.

That said if the missile could get past the highly advanced RAMs and CIWS..



Actually, since the Iowa Class was built after Pearl Harbor, they were design with fairly thick deck armor as well.
The only real weapon that could take out a battleship in most modern weapons inventories is a Tactical Nuc.
*Former Director of the ES 2.0 Media Team*
*Commander of the Yellow Squadron*

Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   Demon Lord Razgriz 

  • Dalek Emperor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 1,414
  • Joined: 12-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Crucible
  • Aircraft:Dalek Saucer

Posted 30 January 2009 - 03:03 PM

QUOTE (Ribbon-Crimson @ Jan 29 2009, 01:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Another problem is with battleships. They are pretty much impervious to antiship missiles.

Harpoon missiles have a high explosive warhead designed to penetrate the thin skin of most modern naval ships. The Iowa Class Battleships had a 16 inch armor belt at the waterline for torpedoes. Since your Antiship missiles are designed to impact at the waterline, they are pretty much useless.

the only real way to take them out will bombs is with armor-piercing bombs.

QUOTE
Actually, since the Iowa Class was built after Pearl Harbor, they were design with fairly thick deck armor as well.
The only real weapon that could take out a battleship in most modern weapons inventories is a Tactical Nuc.


Finally! Someone who realizes that Battleships are still capable of fighting on todays battlefield and survive with ease. biggrin.gif
YOU WILL BE EXTERMINATED!!
0

#16 User is offline   Heinkel 

  • People's Republic of Electrosphere
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 2,272
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Aircraft:F/A-32C Erne

Posted 30 January 2009 - 11:33 PM

QUOTE (Ribbon-Crimson @ Jan 30 2009, 06:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Actually, since the Iowa Class was built after Pearl Harbor, they were design with fairly thick deck armor as well.
The only real weapon that could take out a battleship in most modern weapons inventories is a Tactical Nuc.

ROFL, that just spews ignorance. So torpedoes (General Belgrano was sunk by two old torpedoes), bunker busters (Vittorio Veneto-class was sunk by two AP bombs), heavy cruise/antiship missiles, other heavy artillery and BRBMs carry the same ammount of energy as a nuke, eh?
I'd like to mention how the german Prinz Eugen was not sunk by an underwater nuke and the USS Arkansas survived an airburst just 170 yards away. Both nukes were more powerful than today's tacticals.

Okaay, guys, take in mind you are using the completely laughable Harpoon as a comparison point. Why not the Moskit or the Oniks, that travel at thrice the speed and have much bigger warheads? Also, AShMs are never fired alone but most modern tactics involve the missiles being fired en masse (no, the Kirov isn't completely covered in VLSs just for the lulz). Even if the battleship destroyed the missile when in close it would still be enough of a kinetic projectile to damage the battleship. And of course, there would be more in the way.

QUOTE
the only real way to take them out will bombs is with armor-piercing bombs.

What the crap are you talking about? AShMs ARE armor-piercing
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#17 User is offline   Tazuren 

  • Lord of Nightmares. Info Freak of ES. Co-founder of SNFU.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 2,244
  • Joined: 16-July 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Out destroying the world, and looking for Ribbon-Blue's hideout.
  • Aircraft:F-22V-2 Necroraptor
  • Squadron:666th Strategic/Tactical Fighter Squadron

Posted 30 January 2009 - 11:42 PM

QUOTE (Heinkel @ Jan 30 2009, 03:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'd like to mention how the german Prinz Eugen was not sunk by an underwater nuke and the USS Arkansas survived an airburst just 170 yards away. Both nukes were more powerful than today's tacticals.


That was with the Baker event of the Operation Crossroads test wasn't it?
<<Peace through Superior Firepower>>
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Heinkel on Turbofans: Yes, nobody will notice tin foil turbofans in planes.
0

#18 User is offline   Ribbon-Rena 

  • ES Resident Lurker
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 1,273
  • Joined: 05-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Electrosphere
  • Aircraft:F-16C B50+

Posted 31 January 2009 - 09:17 AM

Well, battleships are quite powerful defensively, but offensively, their guns are less-useful other than Beach bombardment. With, missiles though.. It's a different story..

So.. [/END]??
QUOTE (Ribbon-Blue)
But I'm afria of the backwars 'b' button! D:


The Colorless One.. Almost became -Aqua, if Mr. Blue approves it, which he didn't
NOTE: 1. Sig too huge will be reminded, and warned, and moved
NOTE: 2. Necroposting is not illegal, if not done excessively and meaninglessly..
0

#19 User is offline   Heinkel 

  • People's Republic of Electrosphere
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 2,272
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Aircraft:F/A-32C Erne

Posted 31 January 2009 - 07:13 PM

Um, no, actually. They lack AEGIS, so they must be escorted by other ships.
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#20 User is offline   Ribbon-Blue 

  • ES is Knowledge.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Ultra Director
  • Posts: 2,758
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver, Colorado
  • Aircraft:Something with SAAMs.
  • Squadron:SMS

Posted 31 January 2009 - 09:42 PM

Now that I think about it, a Battleship packing an AEGIS system would be quite the beast. It'd probably need more upgrades than that, but it'd definitely be even more of a threat.
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options
  Or sign in with these services