[EstovakianHarrierPlus]

A Suggestion: Should we rename the article to Su-37 Flanker-F?

[Protostealth]

If the aircraft is called Su-37 Terminator in-game, then it's better to leave the article as Su-37 Terminator, end of story. Same goes for Acepedia, Rodd: I don't want to ban you for two weeks just because you kept changing the F-16C Block60 article's name to F-16E.

[Shirai_Kuroko]

RoddH, on 09 October 2011 - 12:48 AM, said:

A Suggestion: Should we rename the article to Su-37 Flanker-F?

Rodd, I KNOW that you are a fighter jet expert or something like that. But please, this is an Ace Combat and not an aviator forums, and the players don't need to be too realistic. Let's just leave it as is. You'll just confuse casual players who don't know aviation as much as us.

Protostealth, on 09 October 2011 - 10:05 PM, said:

If the aircraft is called Su-37 Terminator in-game, then it's better to leave the article as Su-37 Terminator, end of story. Same goes for Acepedia, Rodd: I don't want to ban you for two weeks just because you kept changing the F-16C Block60 article's name to F-16E.

[EstovakianHarrierPlus]

Terminator is only used in Stealth and this game.. which sounds disturbing to me.

[Shirai_Kuroko]

EstovakianHarrierPlus, on 12 October 2011 - 02:06 PM, said:

Stealth

If the name "Terminator" is not annoying. I bet the two seat configuration of the Su-37 in that movie would annoy us even more.

Still, Stealth was better than Twilight.

[Jason]

EstovakianHarrierPlus, on 12 October 2011 - 02:06 PM, said:

Terminator is only used in Stealth and this game.. which sounds disturbing to me.

Isn't it Terminator in Zero too?
(not played Zero is a while)

[Keksz]

It's actually also called Terminator in ACX and ACJA

[Rolf_blaze_Dk]

Keksz, on 09 December 2011 - 09:27 PM, said:

It's actually also called Terminator in ACX and ACJA

"This game" equals the Ace Combat series.

[Jason]

Rolf_blaze_Dk, on 10 December 2011 - 11:43 PM, said:

"This game" equals the Ace Combat series.

Not likeing a game dose not mean it is not part of the series.

[Rolf_blaze_Dk]

Jason, on 11 December 2011 - 12:51 AM, said:

Not likeing a game dose not mean it is not part of the series.

Uh... What? I was referring to Protostealth's post from a while back where he said that in "This game" (the Ace Combat Series), the Su-37 has been known as the "Terminator", not as the Flanker-F?

[Jason]

Rolf_blaze_Dk, on 12 December 2011 - 12:45 AM, said:

Uh... What? I was referring to Protostealth's post from a while back where he said that in "This game" (the Ace Combat Series), the Su-37 has been known as the "Terminator", not as the Flanker-F?

Sorry, Misinterpreted. Still transitioning from ACS's Hate anger.

[Rolf_blaze_Dk]

Jason, on 12 December 2011 - 03:14 AM, said:

Sorry, Misinterpreted. Still transitioning from ACS's Hate anger.

We haven't really used that for an eternity here. Anyway, back on topic. Why has it not been added to the article that this will appear in ACAH as DLC from Wednesday?

[Mr. P]

What the problem with the name 'Terminator'? If we go in that way, why not name the page as T-10M11? This is useless...
If in game it's called as 'Terminator', so we must keep this name.

[viperzerof-2]

I know they say flanker a few times in ace combat 04 "bullseye on that Flanker!"

[Albireo]

viperzerof-2, on 12 December 2011 - 09:35 PM, said:

I know they say flanker a few times in ace combat 04 "bullseye on that Flanker!"

They refer all Flanker versions, yes. I recall the Terminator being called that since Jane's added it to their list (All the World's Aircraft) and game (ATF) long ago.

[Shirai_Kuroko]

Frankly, in some games like Heatseeker, it is called "Super Flanker" instead

[Broth3r]

Just wondering, shouldn't this be listed under Experimental and not Fighters?

[Mr. P]

Broth3r, on 13 January 2012 - 05:27 AM, said:

Just wondering, shouldn't this be listed under Experimental and not Fighters?

Same with Su-47 and T-50.