Millie, on 24 December 2011 - 08:38 PM, said:
Alright, alright. Hang tight here...
I want to know what you all think. Do we want this included in the article? I'd be happy to rewrite it to include the information, and I'll source the Japanese Wikipedia, but I need to know whether or not everyone here's willing to accept it.
To be fair, I noticed some interesting sources in that Wikipedia article from works that don't seem to exist in this country. This might be where the information came from, its just not sourced in-line.
If we're cool with it, I'll also make sure to update the respective weapons articles and the ADF-01 article to reflect the changes.
What do you guys think? Canon or fanon?
her
Fanon until proved canon. I wish we had someone from Japan on here, since it
could be that that info is in the artbook. That's probably the deciding factor here, since the other refs on the Wikipedia article are from strategy guides, and some fanon could slip in there, too. I think it's best to assume this stuff isn't correct, until proven otherwise. Man, we really need to get our collective hands on that artbook.