Nimitz class Super Carrier

4 Pages
« First
←
2
3
4

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

Nimitz class Super Carrier Nuclear Powered Aircraft Carrier

#61 Guest_RaptorR3D_*

Group: Guests

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:01 PM

Main image fixed.

#62 EstovakianHarrierPlus

DUMP FLARES!

Group: Adv. Contributors
Posts: 1,737
Joined: 24-October 10
Gender:Male
Location:Phillipines/USA (currently in South Korea)
Aircraft:F-15C,TU-2S,F-16CG,AV-8B+
Squadron:67th AGRS

Posted 07 June 2011 - 01:37 AM

Thanks for adding in the image!

<<viperzerof-2>>:
ACS is a anarchy where you can get away with any stupid comment, if you like ACS fine but you're wrong. No matter what logic you come up with. It is only "fun" in an online world were these conditions of anonymity exist and people can escape their lives and play alpha pseudo intellectual.

#63 Guest_RaptorR3D_*

Group: Guests

Posted 07 June 2011 - 12:26 PM

Hope the carrier take-offs are faster this time, they seemed a tad too slow in AC5.

#64 EstovakianHarrierPlus

DUMP FLARES!

Group: Adv. Contributors
Posts: 1,737
Joined: 24-October 10
Gender:Male
Location:Phillipines/USA (currently in South Korea)
Aircraft:F-15C,TU-2S,F-16CG,AV-8B+
Squadron:67th AGRS

Posted 07 June 2011 - 12:54 PM

Slower in ACJA, and in ACX.

#65 Keksz

Desperate Modder

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 04-May 11
Gender:Male
Location:Germany
Aircraft:X-02 Wyvern

Posted 07 June 2011 - 12:59 PM

RoddH, on 07 June 2011 - 12:54 PM, said:

Slower in ACJA, and in ACX.

In ACJA take offs were totally stupid. Taking of with a Tomcat in 3sec to 800mph

#66 Steel Hawk

Group: Adv. Contributors
Posts: 655
Joined: 08-April 08
Gender:Male
Location:USA
Aircraft:F-15C Eagle

Posted 07 June 2011 - 08:58 PM

All take offs and landings are stupidly inaccurate in Ace Combat.

---------------------------------
Posted Image

#67 Shirai_Kuroko

ABA 4Ever!

Group: Members
Posts: 659
Joined: 12-March 11
Gender:Male
Location:Jakarta, Indonesia
Aircraft:Su-25TM "Grach", F-15E, MD-90, B734
Squadron:The Farce

Posted 08 June 2011 - 03:10 AM

AC04's CTO is pretty much to be better-You can't lift off before you get off the deck. Also, stupid catapault will re-fire if you somehow stop right after the catapult launches you. Causing you to crash as you'll get thrown off before you can gain enough speed to be airborne

Im age not by me. Signature credits to Misaka Work

#68 EstovakianHarrierPlus

DUMP FLARES!

Group: Adv. Contributors
Posts: 1,737
Joined: 24-October 10
Gender:Male
Location:Phillipines/USA (currently in South Korea)
Aircraft:F-15C,TU-2S,F-16CG,AV-8B+
Squadron:67th AGRS

Posted 08 June 2011 - 06:52 AM

JA's was err.. too fast..

#69 Guest_RaptorR3D_*

Group: Guests

Posted 08 June 2011 - 04:14 PM

I always thought AC04's were the best, though I usually skipped manual landings on the SS carrier.

#70 Steel Hawk

Group: Adv. Contributors
Posts: 655
Joined: 08-April 08
Gender:Male
Location:USA
Aircraft:F-15C Eagle

Posted 08 June 2011 - 05:03 PM

Like I said before, only AC04 has anywhere close to proper glide slope for landings, but carrier landings have always been laughably bad.

---------------------------------
Posted Image

#71 EstovakianHarrierPlus

DUMP FLARES!

Group: Adv. Contributors
Posts: 1,737
Joined: 24-October 10
Gender:Male
Location:Phillipines/USA (currently in South Korea)
Aircraft:F-15C,TU-2S,F-16CG,AV-8B+
Squadron:67th AGRS

Posted 10 June 2011 - 06:23 AM

What about ACX's ones lol.

#72 Roaches

Desperate. Your turn...

Group: Members
Posts: 1,099
Joined: 31-October 08
Gender:Not Telling
Location:California
Aircraft:Skyly-J2
Squadron:What Squadron?

Posted 10 June 2011 - 06:28 AM

TornadoADV, on 07 June 2011 - 08:58 PM, said:

All take offs and landings are stupidly inaccurate in Ace Combat.

I agree, but landing speeds in AC6 were acceptable even if it was way off realism...
besides, I like doing highspeed landings, even though they're risky at times XD

Our biochem corpus is far advanced as their's. Our Electronic Old Men and their "flexibility" has allowed us to make progress in the mythical city on the hills

#73 Broth3r

Top Gun Instructor

Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 12-June 10
Gender:Male
Location:Lisbon, Portugal, and lovin' it.
Aircraft:JAS 39 Gripen NG

Posted 10 June 2011 - 10:52 AM

Roaches, on 10 June 2011 - 06:28 AM, said:

I agree, but landing speeds in AC6 were acceptable even if it was way off realism...
besides, I like doing highspeed landings, even though they're risky at times XD

Saint Viktor | Diary of an Unknown Soldier | And on a completely different note: Madoka Magica - Zero. Yes, that Zero.

#74 EstovakianHarrierPlus

DUMP FLARES!

Group: Adv. Contributors
Posts: 1,737
Joined: 24-October 10
Gender:Male
Location:Phillipines/USA (currently in South Korea)
Aircraft:F-15C,TU-2S,F-16CG,AV-8B+
Squadron:67th AGRS

Posted 10 June 2011 - 11:45 AM

Wow, just wow.

#75 AceofAces

GRRR DEATH HAHA DEATH

Group: Members
Posts: 579
Joined: 20-September 08
Gender:Male
Location:England, UK
Aircraft:Su-Farty7 Turdinator
Squadron:Exturdination Squad

Posted 10 June 2011 - 02:07 PM

I'm not sure if I'm impressed, or amused by the retarded lack of realism.

#76 MobiusElite

Airman

Group: Members
Posts: 99
Joined: 10-September 10
Gender:Male
Aircraft:F-22A Raptor,X-02 Wyvern,F/A-18D Hornet

Posted 10 June 2011 - 04:39 PM

you must have a dead wish to do something like that LOL^^

Raidst the blue skies,a link from past to future.
The sheltering wings of the protector...

Posted Image

#77 Tazuren

Lord of Nightmares. Info Freak of ES. Co-founder of SNFU.

Group: Adv. Contributors
Posts: 2,244
Joined: 16-July 08
Gender:Male
Location:Out destroying the world, and looking for Ribbon-Blue's hideout.
Aircraft:F-22V-2 Necroraptor
Squadron:666th Strategic/Tactical Fighter Squadron

Posted 10 June 2011 - 05:06 PM

I always land straight from the bow.

<<Peace through Superior Firepower>>
Posted Image

Heinkel on Turbofans: Yes, nobody will notice tin foil turbofans in planes.

#78 Roaches

Desperate. Your turn...

Group: Members
Posts: 1,099
Joined: 31-October 08
Gender:Not Telling
Location:California
Aircraft:Skyly-J2
Squadron:What Squadron?

Posted 10 June 2011 - 08:11 PM

Broth3r, on 10 June 2011 - 10:52 AM, said:

Done that before ages ago... I prefer doing airbase landings than carrier. But regardless how off realism it is, I still like to take the sane landing approach on land than on carrier

Our biochem corpus is far advanced as their's. Our Electronic Old Men and their "flexibility" has allowed us to make progress in the mythical city on the hills

#79 Shirai_Kuroko

ABA 4Ever!

Group: Members
Posts: 659
Joined: 12-March 11
Gender:Male
Location:Jakarta, Indonesia
Aircraft:Su-25TM "Grach", F-15E, MD-90, B734
Squadron:The Farce

Posted 11 June 2011 - 03:51 AM

I had once did a very stupid landing on OFS Kestrel. I put my F-14A too fast and it ends up going over the deck, but I managed to recover, did a loop, and landed in the midsection of the carrier, and guess what is the response? "Perfect, Blaze!".

Too bad that I didn't record it, so you guys may not trust me on this one

Im age not by me. Signature credits to Misaka Work