Electrosphere.info: Iowa-class Battleship - Electrosphere.info

Jump to content

Hide message Show message
Welcome to Electrosphere.info!

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more.

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Iowa-class Battleship Warship

#1 User is offline   Ribbon-Grey 

  • Admin by any other name
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,321
  • Joined: 04-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Aircraft:MH-60K / Rafale
  • Squadron:SMS

Posted 05 April 2008 - 07:47 PM

Iowa-class Battleship
- Warship -



- Iowa class BB Image A - Iowa class BB Image C -

Origin: (Real World)
United States of America

Games Featured In:
Ace Combat 04: Shattered Skies
Ace Combat 5: The Unsung War
Ace Combat X: Skies of Deception
Ace Combat 6: Fires of Liberation
Ace Combat Xi: Skies of Incursion

Operators:
Aurelian navy
Erusian Navy
Estovakian Navy
Leasath Navy
Yuktobanian Navy

Notable Vessels:
Battleship Tanager of the Erusean 'Invincible' Aegir Fleet (AC04)
Battleship Upor of the Yuktobanian Navy (AC5)

Armament:
3 x 16-inch Turrets, with nine cannons total
multiple 5 inch (127 mm) / 38-Caliber Guns in a series of twin mounts
4 x Phalanx Close-In Weapons Systems
16 x RGM-84 Harpoon Launch Tubes
32 x BGM-109 Tomahawk Missile Armored Box Launchers

Aircraft:
3 x Helicopters
8 x RQ-2 Pioneer Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).

Overview:
The Iowa-class battleships were the biggest, the most powerful, and the last battleships built for the United States Navy. Four were built in the early 1940s for World War II. All were decommissioned, then recommissioned in the 1980s and decommissioned again in the 1990s. The Iowas were designed to be faster than Battleships before them, rely on a mixed force of fire power, and were made capable to sail the same speed as a Carrier Force.

Two more were laid down but were scrapped prior to completion. Built with cost as no object, "The Iowa-class fast battleships were arguably the ultimate capital ship in the evolution of the battleship." Yet even as these behemoths entered service, they were being eclipsed by aircraft carriers as the most important naval vessels.

The Iowa-class battleships improved upon the earlier South Dakota class with more powerful engines, longer-caliber guns giving greater range and an additional 200 feet (60 m) of length for improved sea keeping. The Iowas are widely considered to be amongst the most attractive battleships ever built, with a long, narrow, elegant bow and three powerful gun turrets. While excellent sea boats, the ships are quite wet forward due to the long bow. Like all American battleships of her generation, her armament was laid out in two turrets before the superstructure and one after ("2-A-1"), with the 5 inch dual-purpose secondaries (anti-ship and anti-aircraft) flanking the superstructure. They were relatively slender by battleship standards for their length, due to the necessity of building them to a Panamax configuration for transit through the Panama Canal. This made them difficult to armor, especially forward, near the #1 turret. The ships are actually two feet wider than what is accepted in the present day as a Panamax configuration, only allowing a single foot of clearance on either side of the hull. The follow-on Montana class battleships, if ever completed, would have been built to a post-Panamax design, being 12 feet beamier than the Iowa class.


Sources:
Ace Combat Series (In Game Data)
Answers.com

* Original Article by Garm 3

<div align='center'><img src="http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc131/jetfreak/RGreyV2.png" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" /></div>
0

#2 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 14 April 2008 - 07:49 PM

Article re-colored.
0

#3 Guest_Ace of Aces_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 14 April 2008 - 08:44 PM

Amazin' pic of it firin' wub.gif:


0

#4 User is offline   Green Giant 

  • Yellow Squadron Commander
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,910
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere between here and there....
  • Aircraft:What ever is best for the mission
  • Squadron:The Yellow Squadron

Posted 18 April 2008 - 05:13 PM

QUOTE (Ace of Aces @ Apr 14 2008, 04:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Amazin' pic of it firin' wub.gif:




Yeah..... Look at the shock waves in the water from the concussion....
*Former Director of the ES 2.0 Media Team*
*Commander of the Yellow Squadron*

Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   Demon Lord Razgriz 

  • Dalek Emperor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 1,414
  • Joined: 12-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Crucible
  • Aircraft:Dalek Saucer

Posted 03 June 2008 - 04:27 AM

I don't remember the Iowa's ever carrying UAVs. huh.gif
YOU WILL BE EXTERMINATED!!
0

#6 User is offline   JianDaoXiao 

  • penetration
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,945
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Perú
  • Aircraft:Fenrir

Posted 03 June 2008 - 06:55 PM

What a...!!!
You alright DLR, and the Iowa is from USA, and the Pionner is from Rusia, so, USA buy sovietics things?
My Love
---->Daniita<----
0

#7 User is offline   Heinkel 

  • People's Republic of Electrosphere
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 2,272
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Aircraft:F/A-32C Erne

Posted 03 June 2008 - 09:19 PM

Pioneer's from either US or Israel IIRC
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#8 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 03 June 2008 - 10:34 PM

The Pioneer is not Russian. They're Israeli-designed.
0

#9 User is offline   JianDaoXiao 

  • penetration
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,945
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Perú
  • Aircraft:Fenrir

Posted 03 June 2008 - 10:48 PM

anyway, the Iowa have pionners in there?
My Love
---->Daniita<----
0

#10 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 03 June 2008 - 10:52 PM

QUOTE (JianDaoXiao @ Jun 3 2008, 05:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
anyway, the Iowa have pionners in there?

Well, they used to. The battleships have been long retired from use.
0

#11 User is offline   Demon Lord Razgriz 

  • Dalek Emperor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 1,414
  • Joined: 12-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Crucible
  • Aircraft:Dalek Saucer

Posted 07 July 2008 - 08:22 PM

I've looked and looked and looked, I can find anywhere that states the Iowas carryed UAVs. I even found a website dedicated to battleships and says nothing about it carrying UAVs.

Here's the link to said site:http://www.battleship.org/html/Articles/Io.../Statistics.htm
YOU WILL BE EXTERMINATED!!
0

#12 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 07 July 2008 - 08:24 PM

That's strange, the Wisconsin carried Pioneers during the gulf war.

RQ-2 Pioneer Article
0

#13 User is offline   Demon Lord Razgriz 

  • Dalek Emperor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 1,414
  • Joined: 12-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Crucible
  • Aircraft:Dalek Saucer

Posted 07 July 2008 - 10:01 PM

That wouldn't count, they only deployed it from there because they needed to keep an eye on the Iraqi troops. It wasn't a normal weapon for the Iowa so it needs to be taken off or we need to add a whole lot of stuff to other articles.
YOU WILL BE EXTERMINATED!!
0

#14 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 08 July 2008 - 06:37 PM

Well that site you found has it wrong; beginning in 1986, Iowas started carrying Pioneer UAVs:

Iowa class Battleship / Aircraft
0

#15 User is offline   JakeHarlow 

  • Jason "Jake" Harlow - Phoenix 5/Victory
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 220
  • Joined: 12-May 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Jacksonville, FL
  • Aircraft:F-14D; F/A-18F
  • Squadron:Sins & Saints (formerly RSQ)

Posted 06 October 2008 - 08:57 PM

What's the primary reason we don't use battleships anymore? I suppose there hasn't been a major navy-to-navy engagement in recent history, barring the incident involving Britain and Argentina...Plus, these battleships are probably very expensive to maintain and produce. So, I guess, if we're not using them, what's the point in throwing money down a useless, albeit, well-armed hole?
"Never let them see you bleed, and always have an escape route."

0

#16 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 07 October 2008 - 02:18 AM

QUOTE (JakeHarlow @ Oct 6 2008, 03:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What's the primary reason we don't use battleships anymore? I suppose there hasn't been a major navy-to-navy engagement in recent history, barring the incident involving Britain and Argentina...Plus, these battleships are probably very expensive to maintain and produce. So, I guess, if we're not using them, what's the point in throwing money down a useless, albeit, well-armed hole?

The battleships are too dated to remain effective naval vessels nowadays. Advances in technology and changes in surface-to-surface warfare, have negated the usefulness of these venerable warships. The arsenal ship concept seems promising, although I doubt that it will ever leave the drawing board. Plus.....G.Britian and Argentina didn't use battleships during the Falkland Islands campaign; if that's what you were referring to.

QUOTE (JakeHarlow @ Oct 6 2008, 03:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What's the primary reason we don't use battleships anymore? Plus, these battleships are probably very expensive to maintain and produce.

I think you just answered your own question. tongue.gif
0

#17 User is offline   Heinkel 

  • People's Republic of Electrosphere
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 2,272
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Aircraft:F/A-32C Erne

Posted 15 December 2008 - 09:32 PM

Image restored and edits made. Some comedian put an image of the XC-01 in the 'Image A' link
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#18 User is offline   Sky Captain 

  • Sound the Trumpets of Valor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 380
  • Joined: 16-January 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA
  • Aircraft:F-15C Eagle
  • Squadron:345th TFS "Lancers"

Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:38 AM

I've see and been on the Battleship NewJesery in Camden NJ a few times
R.I.P. ,Strangereal Universe

1997-2009
0

#19 User is offline   Roaches 

  • Desperate. Your turn...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 31-October 08
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:California
  • Aircraft:Skyly-J2
  • Squadron:What Squadron?

Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:26 AM



I made this model not too long ago for Command and Conquer: Red Alert 2 biggrin.gif
Posted Image
Our biochem corpus is far advanced as their's. Our Electronic Old Men and their "flexibility" has allowed us to make progress in the mythical city on the hills
0

#20 User is offline   Tazuren 

  • Lord of Nightmares. Info Freak of ES. Co-founder of SNFU.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 2,244
  • Joined: 16-July 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Out destroying the world, and looking for Ribbon-Blue's hideout.
  • Aircraft:F-22V-2 Necroraptor
  • Squadron:666th Strategic/Tactical Fighter Squadron

Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:28 AM

QUOTE (Roaches @ Jan 20 2009, 04:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I made this model not too long ago for Command and Conquer: Red Alert 2 biggrin.gif



Loks like the symbol on the flag of Emmeria.
<<Peace through Superior Firepower>>
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Heinkel on Turbofans: Yes, nobody will notice tin foil turbofans in planes.
0

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options
  Or sign in with these services