Sea Shadow (IX-529) Experimental Warship
#21
Posted 22 July 2008 - 05:52 PM
*Commander of the Yellow Squadron*
#24
Posted 22 October 2008 - 02:21 AM
— Captain David McCampbell, USN, leading U.S. Navy ace in W.W.II.



Rot Squadron: When it absolutely, positively has to be taken out overnight!
#25
Posted 25 December 2008 - 02:33 AM
Uh, not really Heinkel. The Stealth Ship from Tomorrow Never Dies was simliar to the Sea Shadow, but it certainly was not a Sea Shadow. And if you need proof, the movie ship had large pontoons, while Sea Shadow does not. The movie ship is also armed and much larger.
"I'm a leaf on the wind. . .watch how I soar." -Wash
#26
Posted 30 December 2008 - 02:57 PM
The "MOVIE" ship is also a mockup. Not to scale either. and the REAL Sea Shadow DOES have pontoons... This is the reason the ship is able to float. This also make is a very stable platform.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/sea_shadow.htm
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/sys...hadow-schem.htm
*Commander of the Yellow Squadron*
#28
Posted 22 May 2011 - 10:53 AM


<<viperzerof-2>>:
ACS is a anarchy where you can get away with any stupid comment, if you like ACS fine but you're wrong. No matter what logic you come up with. It is only "fun" in an online world were these conditions of anonymity exist and people can escape their lives and play alpha pseudo intellectual.
#29
Posted 22 May 2011 - 12:34 PM
#30
Posted 24 May 2011 - 11:01 PM
SatoKasu (ACS), on 22 May 2011 - 12:34 PM, said:
IRL it was a stealth technology demonstrator, intended to show that F-117 type stealth could be applied to things other than planes. they tried to sell the desing to the navy as a air defense Frigate. the idea being that since it was practically invisible to enemy radar, it could range ahead of a carrier group or task force, and engage enemy planes with SAM's and enemy ships with anti-shipping missiles, all without the enemy ever getting a chance to shoot back.
the navy wasn't interested, due to a combination of cost (very expensive, with lots of special materials), secrecy (stealth was still deep black tech..the headaches of building the ships and operating them without the secret of their stealth getting out was an issue), and office politics (the sea shadow was so automated that you only needed a dozen people to run the ship...a conventional ship of the same size and role would have hundreds of people. and with it's secrecy, the captains and higher officers in charge wouldn't be able to claim it as experiance towards promotion easily.. all branches of the military have a fetish about being in charge of large numbers of people being a good way to look important.)
#31
Posted 25 May 2011 - 01:06 PM


<<viperzerof-2>>:
ACS is a anarchy where you can get away with any stupid comment, if you like ACS fine but you're wrong. No matter what logic you come up with. It is only "fun" in an online world were these conditions of anonymity exist and people can escape their lives and play alpha pseudo intellectual.

Help
Halo
Assasin's Creed
Call of Duty
Diablo
Final Fantasy
God of War
Starcraft
Socom
World of Warcraft
World of Warcraft 2




























