Electrosphere.info: Scinfaxi-class Submarine - Electrosphere.info

Jump to content

Hide message Show message
Welcome to Electrosphere.info!

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more.

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Scinfaxi-class Submarine Yuktobanian Arsenal Ship

#1 User is offline   lincer556 

  • Veteran Airman
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 190
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Argentina
  • Aircraft:ADF-01F

Posted 11 April 2008 - 10:49 PM

SCINFAXI CLASS SUBMARINE
- Yuktobanian Arsenal Ship-


- the Scinfaxi in its dry dock before being deployed -

Information:
Purpose: Submersible Aircraft Carrier / Ballistic Missile Submarine.
Manufacturer(s): Yuktobania
Date Started: 1980s
Date Completed: September of 1991
Date Destroyed: October 4th, 2010 (Scinfaxi), November 14th, 2010 (Hrimfaxi)

Armaments: Anti-Aircraft Guns; SAM Launchers; Burst Missile Launchers
Firing Range: Unknown; However, its Burst Missiles seem to have continental range (about 700-1200 miles)
Energy Source: Nuclear Reactors

Specifications:
Height: Unknown
Width: Unknown
Length: N/A
Weight: 100 kt.+ (estimate)

Development:
Scinfaxi class submarines are relics of the Cold War, an effort to overcome Osea’s Strategic Defense Initiative, which would shoot down Yuktobanian ICBMs. Osean missile defense systems could easily loiter over fixed ICBM launchers and disable every missile they fired. The Yuktobanian military decided to switch to a mobile force of stealthy SSBNs to counter this, allowing them to launch from and strike any position in the world with a lessened vulnerability to defensive systems. The Scinfaxi class was envisioned as the centerpiece of this plan: it could carry a payload of several types of missiles, ranging from ICBMs to theater ballistic missiles, was stealthier than the Typhoon SSBNs in widespread service with the Yuktobanian Navy, and had its own air wing for self defense and power projection.

The ship’s design is based heavily on the FCU’s Dragonet class, though the Yuktobanian government refuses to acknowledge this. The Scinfaxi also finds its roots in a design that has never been fully explored: the Arsenal Ship concept. Imagined by the Yuktobanian Navy’s Admiral Leonov, an Arsenal Ship is an unmanned, floating, mobile missile platform that could operate in support of CVBGs. However, an Arsenal Ship would operate in a tactical role with conventional cruise missiles, whereas the Scinfaxi is a strategic asset.

The lead ship of the class, Scinfaxi, was unveiled to the Yuktobanian public by the state-run news agency in 1991, following trials of her Multi-Purpose Burst Missiles. The MPBM warhead employs Belkan technology with the ability to split into several submunitions and cause numerous explosions over a wide area and varying altitudes. The Scinfaxi incorporated a small hangar and flight deck aft of the bridge to carry aircraft. The second ship of the class, Hrimfaxi, eliminated the flight deck and instead carried Cormorant UCAVs in her vertical launch system.


History:
The first known deployment of the Scinfaxi-class Submarine was on September 30th, 2010 when its crew launched a surprise attack on the OFS Kestrel, Vulture, and Buzzard, Osea’s three carriers. After deploying a squadron of aircraft equipped with anti-ship missiles, the Scinfaxi used its Burst Missiles to sink two of the three carriers – the Vulture and the Buzzard – leaving Osea defenseless.

The Scinfaxi unveiled itself again on October 4th, 2010, backing the Yuktobanian forces that were attempting to land on and capture Sand Island Air Force Base, which was going to be a crucial staging point for an invasion of Osea. However, using data from a sonobuoy, the Oseans turned the tide of battle with the Arkbird, a space plane that had just received a weapons-grade laser the day before. Due to a crucial hit, the Scinfaxi was forced to surface, where it unleashed a firestorm of anti-air, fighters, and even burst missiles. However, it was finally sunk by a combined operation between the Arkbird and the 108th Tactical Fighter Squadron.

While the Hrimfaxi was technically at the battle, it did not partake in supporting the Yutkobanian landing fleet and fled after watching the explosive death of its twin. It resurfaced shortly after the Osean landing at the Bastok Peninsula, using Burst Missiles to rain fire on Osean forces as they began to advance into Yuktobania. In response, the Osean High Command authorized the 108th Tactical Fighter Squadron to engage and sink the Hrimfaxi in the Razgriz Straits of Anea.

On November 14th, 2010, the 108th flew in low to engage the Hrimfaxi while it was being resupplied. However, the squadron was picked up by one of the Hrimfaxi's picket submarines, forcing the resupply operation to be cut short. However, the Hrimfaxi had one fatal flaw: it needed to surface to launch its burst missiles. Timing their attacks to hit the ship when it surfaced, the 108th dealt a lethal blow to the ship, earning them the moniker of: “The Demons of Razgriz”. Without their long-range missile support, the Yuktobanian military quickly began to be rolled up by the Osean advance.

Miscellaneous Notes:
The Hrimfaxi and Scinfaxi submarines take their names from Norse mythology.

In Norse mythology, Skínfaxi and Hrímfaxi are the horses of Dagr (day) and Nótt (night). The names Skínfaxi and Hrímfaxi are bahuvrihis, meaning "sheen mane" and "rime mane" [or "frost mane"], respectively. Skinfaxi pulled Dagr's chariot across the sky every day and his mane lit up the sky and the earth below.

The myth of Scinfaxi is believed to originate in Nordic Bronze Age religion, for which there is strong evidence of beliefs involving a horse pulling the sun across the sky. The Trundholm sun chariot is drawn by a single horse, and was possibly imagined to be pulled back across the sky west to east by a second horse.



SOURCES
Ace Combat 05: The Unsung War (the game itself)
PROJECT ACES: AC5 SITE - Scinfaxi Article

ACCREDITATION
Article by: echo419 and Ribbon-White.
Slight Modifications by: Ribbon-Blue
Stuka for providing a translation of the "Development Information".
Zaku for re-writing the Development section.
Ribbon-Azure for re-writing the History section.
Media Team Deputy Director

'' Always good to be Back ''
0

#2 User is offline   JianDaoXiao 

  • penetration
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 1,945
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Perú
  • Aircraft:Fenrir

Posted 20 April 2008 - 03:19 AM

Scinfaxi / Hrimfaxi blueprints




My Love
---->Daniita<----
0

#3 User is offline   Zaku 

  • Top Gun Instructor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Adv. Contributors
  • Posts: 331
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newark, NJ
  • Aircraft:F-15SG Slam Eagle
  • Squadron:Freelance Alliance CO

Posted 17 May 2008 - 02:15 AM

Development rewritten, spellchecked, and fact checked with FOLLOW. I'll get around to rewriting the history section sometime.

Scinfaxi class submarines are relics of the Cold War, an effort to overcome Osea’s Strategic Defense Initiative, which would shoot down Yuktobanian ICBMs. Osean missile defense systems could easily loiter over fixed ICBM launchers and disable every missile they fired. The Yuktobanian military decided to switch to a mobile force of stealthy SSBNs to counter this, allowing them to launch from and strike any position in the world with a lessened vulnerability to defensive systems. The Scinfaxi class was envisioned as the centerpiece of this plan: it could carry a payload of several types of missiles, ranging from ICBMs to theater ballistic missiles, was stealthier than the Typhoon SSBNs in widespread service with the Yuktobanian Navy, and had its own air wing for self defense and power projection.

The ship’s design is based heavily on the FCU’s Dragonet class, though the Yuktobanian government refuses to acknowledge this. The Scinfaxi also finds its roots in a design that has never been fully explored: the Arsenal Ship concept. Imagined by the Yuktobanian Navy’s Admiral Leonov, an Arsenal Ship is an unmanned, floating, mobile missile platform that could operate in support of CVBGs. However, an Arsenal Ship would operate in a tactical role with conventional cruise missiles, whereas the Scinfaxi is a strategic asset.

The lead ship of the class, Scinfaxi, was unveiled to the Yuktobanian public by the state-run news agency in 1991, following trials of her Multi-Purpose Burst Missiles. The MPBM warhead employs Belkan technology with the ability to split into several submunitions and cause numerous explosions over a wide area and varying altitudes. The Scinfaxi incorporated a small hangar and flight deck aft of the bridge to carry Sea Harrier and F-35 VTOL aircraft. The second ship of the class, Hrimfaxi, eliminated the flight deck and instead carried Cormorant UCAVs in her vertical launch system.

<div align='center'><img src="http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/1239/telebamacopy.png" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" /></div>
0

#4 User is offline   Ribbon-Azure 

  • Boundless
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,745
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boulder, CO
  • Aircraft:ASF-28 Tomcat II
  • Squadron:VF-23/EASA

Posted 19 June 2008 - 05:08 AM

lolwhut?

How is the design based on the Dragonet class if the Dragonets were around 1998 and this was in 1991? O.o


Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   kuroi tsubasa 

  • Not cannon fodder
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: SMS Project Team
  • Posts: 893
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:SoCal
  • Squadron:Strategic Military Services

Posted 19 June 2008 - 05:59 AM

Then it could be assumed the Dragonets development was way before 1998.

Posted Image
0

#6 User is offline   Ribbon-Azure 

  • Boundless
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,745
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boulder, CO
  • Aircraft:ASF-28 Tomcat II
  • Squadron:VF-23/EASA

Posted 19 June 2008 - 12:46 PM

Yeah, I figured that... but, if the dragonets themselves were made in USEA... then they'd be classified... so Yuktobania wouldn't even know about it.
Posted Image
0

#7 User is offline   Ribbon-Blue 

  • ES is Knowledge.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Ultra Director
  • Posts: 2,758
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver, Colorado
  • Aircraft:Something with SAAMs.
  • Squadron:SMS

Posted 20 June 2008 - 05:34 AM

Thats the thing. If Yuktobania did 'steal' a secret FCU design, what would that say about Yuktobania? Thats why the idea of Yuktobanian stealing it is so controverisal.
0

#8 User is offline   Ribbon-Azure 

  • Boundless
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,745
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boulder, CO
  • Aircraft:ASF-28 Tomcat II
  • Squadron:VF-23/EASA

Posted 20 June 2008 - 05:41 PM

I see.
Posted Image
0

#9 User is offline   Ribbon-Blue 

  • ES is Knowledge.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Ultra Director
  • Posts: 2,758
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver, Colorado
  • Aircraft:Something with SAAMs.
  • Squadron:SMS

Posted 20 June 2008 - 07:16 PM

I feel like I should further explain.

At this time in history Osea and Yuktobania are in the midst of their Cold War. The FCU obviously has had the Dragonet-class Submarine before the publication of the FOLLOW article (1991), wether or not it was made public by that time is a bit up in the air, but doesn't matter with this situation. Because Yuktobania has a "similar" submarine design to the Dragonet-class Subs and the FCU did not/would not give away the designs for such a vessel, the very idea of Yuktobania stealing a some-what classified designed discredits them greatly. Osea calling Yuktobania on that was a sort of 'victory' for them.
0

#10 User is offline   Ribbon-Azure 

  • Boundless
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,745
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boulder, CO
  • Aircraft:ASF-28 Tomcat II
  • Squadron:VF-23/EASA

Posted 20 June 2008 - 09:26 PM

Ah, I see. Thanks Blue.
Posted Image
0

#11 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 15 April 2009 - 02:30 AM

Article format re-colored.
0

#12 User is offline   viperzerof-2 

  • Ace of Aces
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 1,226
  • Joined: 16-January 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Aircraft:F-2A

Posted 02 May 2009 - 05:34 AM

about how long is it?
0

#13 User is offline   Jetfreak 

  • Filipino Ingenuity
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 803
  • Joined: 25-June 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Philippines
  • Aircraft:R-104 Delphinus IV
  • Squadron:Diamonds Sqrn.

Posted 02 May 2009 - 05:50 AM

About the size of a carrier I reckon, I think JDX has the dimensions.
-The Archipelago is currently on hold - DAMN YOU CHEAP HARDDRIVE-
0

#14 User is offline   Ribbon-Azure 

  • Boundless
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,745
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boulder, CO
  • Aircraft:ASF-28 Tomcat II
  • Squadron:VF-23/EASA

Posted 03 May 2009 - 02:55 PM

JDX can't have the dimensions. sleep.gif

And... updated development with Zaku's re-written one, and changed the format.

Re-wrote history.
Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   Jetfreak 

  • Filipino Ingenuity
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 803
  • Joined: 25-June 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Philippines
  • Aircraft:R-104 Delphinus IV
  • Squadron:Diamonds Sqrn.

Posted 03 May 2009 - 03:38 PM

QUOTE
JDX can't have the dimensions


Sad, I always thought he had it archived somewhere. He did a scaling sheet back then, but no Scinfaxi >_<

-The Archipelago is currently on hold - DAMN YOU CHEAP HARDDRIVE-
0

#16 User is offline   GAG-E 

  • 我要和你抗争到底
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Contributors
  • Posts: 516
  • Joined: 03-April 08
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 03 May 2009 - 08:00 PM

QUOTE (Zaku @ May 16 2008, 07:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Development rewritten, spellchecked, and fact checked with FOLLOW. I'll get around to rewriting the history section sometime.

The Scinfaxi incorporated a small hangar and flight deck aft of the bridge to carry Sea Harrier and F-35 VTOL aircraft.


Does the F-35B exist in Ace Combat? I thought it was only the F-35C... and that's not VTOL
Posted Image
Y̨̡̗̙͔͕̭͖̺͎̖̋̄̌͛ͯO̷̵͈̠͔͍̝͙ͭ͗͘U̘̗͇̰͉̳̤̿ͮ́͠ ̢͉̰̦ͣ̈́ͤ̉̾͐ͬͧ͑̀Ḫ̖͎̲̩̈́͒͌̏̀͆̿ͩȦ̮̗̣͔͍͎̲ͧͭ͑ͣ͊͋͢͞ͅV̋ͦ̽͆͋̿͠҉̖Ē̵͖̬̲̗ͥ͟ ̷͓̜ͮͭ̆̌͌ͬ͝C̠͔͎̼̖̑̇͘͡͞O̷̯̣͍̠̳͈͈̲ͪ̊ͤ͢Ṉ͖̣͎̟̥͊̃̓ͤͥ̓̚Ṭ̶͇̜̠̰̗̗͉ͪͫR͒͌̑ͫͯ̓̿̀͏͓͔͖͕͍̖O̝̹̖͓̲̖̤̼͒̑̈́̆̀̀͛̉ͥͅL̼͎̻̼̳̼̪͔̋̎͜ͅ ̴͙͇͍͍̎̏͘͘L̬̻̩̦̖̱̯̄́ͪͅͅṪ̴̰̮͓̯͍̩̝͆ͣ͡ͅ ͦͬ͏͙̻̜̲͝F͖͙ͭͤͪȖ̷̢̙̤̤̣̦̲̃̅̏̓ͥͭĶ̼̺͍̘̼̞̻̱̋́A̷̞̘̯̘̼̭͎̙̣ͭ̐ͭ̏ͮ̋ͭ̊́I̛̮̤̼̳̻̬̱͆͛
Posted Image

"The first time I ever saw a jet, I shot it down."
-Chuck Yeager



0

#17 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 03 May 2009 - 08:29 PM

It was definetly the F-35C; VTOLs haven't been flyable......yet.
0

#18 User is offline   Ribbon-Azure 

  • Boundless
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,745
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boulder, CO
  • Aircraft:ASF-28 Tomcat II
  • Squadron:VF-23/EASA

Posted 03 May 2009 - 08:48 PM

There are Harriers in AC tho.
Posted Image
0

#19 Guest_Ribbon-Cobalt_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 03 May 2009 - 08:51 PM

But they haven't been flyable... blink.gif
0

#20 User is offline   Ribbon-Azure 

  • Boundless
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,745
  • Joined: 10-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boulder, CO
  • Aircraft:ASF-28 Tomcat II
  • Squadron:VF-23/EASA

Posted 03 May 2009 - 08:59 PM

Exactleh.

Yuktobanian Military gets F-35Bs, its simple. lol
Posted Image
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options
  Or sign in with these services